This page has your instructions for the Mock PC assignment. - Please start by reviewing the ethical guidelines for reviewers
- Look at the spreadsheet, and let me know if there are conflicts by 11/5 (detailed definition below). The spreadsheet has the information on who is primary and secondary for each paper. I put XX where there was a known conflict. Those AC members need to simply scroll to the right to see if they are primary (green) or secondary (yellow). If you have a conflict with a paper, just don't look at who's reviewing it please :).
- Read the following documents by 11/5 if possible (but definitely before doing ANYTHING ELSE). Also read the rest of this assignment.
- Assign reviewers by 11/10. These are HYPOTHETICAL reviewers -- you will not actually contact them for this assignment. For instructions on how to pick the RIGHT reviewers, see "Instructions for Reviewers". You only need to assign reviews on the 1AC paper, and you need 3 reviewers for that. You can go to the spreadsheet to enter
reviewer names and check that no one else assigned to the same paper
has selected the same reviewer. To assign reviewers, simply enter their names in the spreadsheet in the columns labeled: R1 R2 and R3. We will also use this spreadsheet to
enter reviewing scores.
- Complete your 1AC and 2AC reviews by 11/17. Put them in an anonymous document labeled with the paper label (leftmost column of the spreadsheet) and send out.
- Attend the PC meeting on 11/19. Take notes here on the discussion
- Complete an anonymized report including a meta review and all reviews by 11/24. To do this, the primary AC needs to collect the reviews for his our her paper, anonymize them (NO REVIEWER NAMES PRESENT), and email them to me so that I can forward them back to authors and have access to them during the PC meeting. Please do this by November 24th.
|
|